I know that you shouldn’t get involved in FaceBook debates, but it was about voter fraud, and it really rubbed me the wrong way. I also freely admit that responding to the “debate” just played into the host/trolls hands. Yet, I don’t feel like we can sit on the sidelines anymore…
The Post:
Say, let’s talk about that 381 page database that keeps being referred to. It is from the Heritage Foundation titled “A Sampling of Election Fraud Cases From Across the Country.” Here is the link to it:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/docs/pacei-voterfraudcases.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0kPCSmTRe6j8wTeMdI73IljE5xLkOQAk_L31lnbIBmh9Jnn5CJDt9Esvk
There is an analysis of that database from The Brennan Center for Justice, a non-partisan law and public policy institute at NYU’s School of Law. The following link gives a quick summery of the Center’s findings on the Heritage’s database, as well as another link to full analysis, titled, “Heritage Fraud Database: As Assessment.”
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/analysis-heritage-foundations-database-undermines-claims-recent-voter
I offer this information to help with the conversation/debate, as voting is the most important foundation stone in the institution of a democracy.
Here is a sampling of their findings:
“Among the examples in the Heritage document are a case from 1948 (when Harry S. Truman beat Thomas Dewey) and a case from 1972 (when Richard Nixon defeated George McGovern). Only 105 of its 749 cases came from within the past five years.
In reviewing billions of votes cast, the Heritage Foundation identified just 10 cases involving in-person impersonation fraud at the polls (fewer than the number of members on the president’s Commission).
The database includes only 41 cases involving non-citizens registering, voting, or attempting to vote over five decades, highlighting the absurdity of President Trump’s claim that millions of non-citizens voted in the 2016 election alone.
Many cases highlighted in the database show that existing laws and safeguards are already preventing voter fraud — the ineligible voters or individuals engaging in misconduct were discovered and prevented from casting a ballot.”
And then there is this quote:
“This ‘database’ does not come close to being an actual study of election misconduct on which national policy should be based,” said Michael Waldman, president of the Brennan Center. “It is a grab-bag of cases, few of them recent, many irrelevant to the panel’s work. Waving around a stack of paper does not make it real evidence.”
I found this information in less than five minutes of searching on the internet. In fact, it took me longer to type this up, than it did to find this analysis. Unfortunately, it is not 380 pages of “convictions” as has been claimed.