That White House Correspondence thing happened over the weekend, and it would appear that some people were offended by the comedian, and then there are some people who are shocked that the integrity of the event has been ruined.
As with all performance, it only means something if you let it mean something…
What I have read is that this is a new reality of the tribalism we live in, with regards to America today. (I think I heard that on This Week) This isn’t new outrage, this is the old outrage. I find this whole situation funny, because where have these people been the last 20 years? I seem to remember Don Imus going after the Clinton’s, and then there was Stephen Colbert and George W. Bush. The Outrage, the Strum and Drang… The adults behaving like children claiming to be adults… “Won’t anyone think about the children…”
What I get tired of is the fact that before an event like the WHCD happened, I already knew that the Trump side was ready to fire back at whatever was said. I mean, Trump was in Michigan that night making the point that he didn’t want to be at the dinner, anyway. SO, that side of the reaction was expected, and rather pedestrian, if you ask me.
What I didn’t expect is that the press was “outraged.” That is what rings the most hypocritical of the lot. The event was to celebrate the 1st Amendment. I can understand some journalist not like the humor, but the should be defending the exercise. The 1st Amendment allows you to be offensive. That’s kind’a the point.